Memory Culture: Dealing with the Past

Cultural memory has a history of its own, as Aleida Assmann writes. However, current research on memory cultures, cultural heritage, and the politics of history focuses on (late) modernity and often examines the use of history today in a national context. Comparative approaches and questions about the transregional and trans-epochal transfer of concepts of the past are still rare. Mary Carruthers and Frances Yates emphasize that medieval and early modern concepts of the past shaped the development of later cultures of remembrance. Poland and East-Central Europe are particularly well suited as laboratories for investigating the translocal transfer of historical images, as individual regions changed their state affiliations more frequently here than elsewhere in Europe.

Regarding cultural history concepts of time and memory, our research examines the understanding and use of history in East-Central Europe. The focus is on the mechanisms of constructing temporality, including the social and material conditions of collective memory, cultural heritage, and the politics of history. It is, therefore, less about reconstructing (past) representations of history and more about a look “behind the scenes” of their production. In particular, the memory of the Second World War, the German occupation, and the Holocaust is associated with enormous political and social expectations. These need to be disentangled and critically scrutinized.

Another focus is on mechanisms of financing remembrance – from patronage by aristocratic families to monetizing personal data in digital media. This raises new questions and offers the opportunity to consider economic history and the history of memory together.

The research area aims at encouraging discussions of the following topics:

  • Mediatization of the past (practices of producing texts, images, etc.)
  • “Invisible hands” in processes of historical knowledge production, e.g., the role of archives, publishers, and translators
  • Financing the culture of remembrance, cultural heritage, and history politics
  • Visual and material production of representations of state and political power

Research Projects:

Infrastructures of memory
About the project:

The title “Infrastructures of Cultural Memory” refers to two interlinked projects, of which both are externally funded and being carried out by larger teams. The first is concerned with seemingly disregarded aspects of exhibitions that focus on the Second World War and the Holocaust – including structural elements, environmental factors and financing structures. These external factors have an impact on the design and perception of the exhibitions and thus on their potential for cultural memory. While museum and memory studies have so far focused on political and semantic dimensions, the infrastructural aspects have remained overwhelmingly within the purview of curators and practitioners . The project therefore aims to find out how infrastructures, i.e. connected  objects and associated practices, affect the memory of War and Holocaust in the the 20th century.

Similar questions provide a point of departure for the second project, which deals with memorials for Holocaust mass graves. An interdisciplinary group of researchers from the fields of history, archaeology, sociology, dendrology, cartography, and other disciplines are investigating the burial sites of Jewish victims who were not deported to extermination camps but were instead shot near their homes in current southeast Poland. Here too, the infrastructures of memory are essential for understanding the killing sites. Why were some mass graves marked as memorials and others not? Ostensibly, these decisions were not only influenced by political agendas , but also by the availability of building materials or the natural environment of the respective sites. Where did the stone for the memorial plaques come from and who transported it there? The answers to these as well as similar questions shed new light on the complex remembrance practices in a geographically peripheral region that has not previously been at the center of Holocaust research.

Paths to Remembrance: Interplay Between Materiality, Conventions, and Design Concepts in Historical Exhibitions
About the project:

The research project is being conducted within the framework of the international project hosted by the German Historical Institute Warsaw and the University of Łódź “Infrastructures of Memory. Actants of Globalisation and their Impact on German and Polish Memory Culture”.The project examines how factors other than content, design, and educational goals influence the creation and maintenance of exhibitions about the Second World War and the Holocaust in Poland and Germany. Such “non-human” factors and circumstances include, for instance, sustainability standards, the use of new technologies, or legal regulations. This study thus addresses the often overlooked topic of the materiality of commemorative practices, and  (it?)   and contextualizes its role in current debates on memory culture in Poland and Germany.The novelty of the project lays in the way it examines the interconnection between curatorial concepts and historical politics on one hand, and external factors  on the other, with special attention being devoted to This comprises[p1]  the interplay between materiality and non-physical aspects, as well as discrepancies between curatorial visions and the actual practical work involved in communicating information and concepts to the public. . Examples of this include the adaptation of traveling exhibitions to local contexts, the preparation of tours for international audiences, and implementation of national “memory laws” (Nikolay Koposov). The project is based on a complex, interdisciplinary methodology that draws on,  anthropology, organizational sociology, museology, and social history, among other approaches. It makes an innovative contribution to social science research as well as to the ongoing and pressing debate on memory culture.

Appropriation and Revitalization. Negotiation Processes of German-Jewish Cultural Heritage in Poland
About the project:

The research project forms part of the DFG priority programme (SPP) 2357, entitled “Jewish Cultural Heritage”. It  and is being carried by the Bet Tfila Research Unit for Jewish Architecture in Europe, which is based at the TU Braunschweig, and the GHI Warsaw. The project's primary objective is to examine the evolution of synagogue management practices in the northern and western regions of Poland since (after?) 1945. This constitutes a significant contribution to the   understanding of the cultural appropriation of the formerly German territories by their new inhabitants. The distinctive feature of these regions is that, as a "post-displacement region," they only came under Polish control after World War II. Consequently, the Jewish heritage in these areas was not perceived as "Polish." This is to say that the Jewish population of these areas were German citizens and, as a rule, strongly acculturated to the German language and culture. The project, based on the examination of a limited number of surviving synagogues (the majority of which  were partially destroyed in 1938 during the “Reichskristallnacht”) , seeks to address the following questions: How were these Jewish buildings perceived in the period following 1945? Was their identity primarily defined as Jewish or German? What forms of use emerged and to what extent did the processes of appropriation differ in the (in comparison to?)  formerly German areas of central Poland? The research will investigate the historical processes that have occurred in the region since 1945, with a particular focus on the present-day context. The project team maintains close contact with institutions and individuals engaged in the preservation and utilization of synagogues in the present day. These are predominantly located in smaller towns, including Kętrzyn (Rastenburg), Barczewo (Wartenburg), Ziębice (Münsterberg) and Dzierżoniów (Reichenbach). This combination of empirical historical research and collaboration with individuals currently responsible for these objects and actively engaged in their preservation represents a distinctive aspect of this project. Through this approach, not only is scientific knowledge generated, but a transfer of knowledge between these two domains is also facilitated. This approach will not only lead to new findings, but also facilitate a transfer of knowledge between these usually separate domains. The Jewish Historical Institute in Warsaw and the Foundation for the Preservation of Jewish Heritage are collaborating with us on this project.

The Instrumetalization of History in Polish Diplomacy toward Germany, 1918–1939
About the project:

This project examines how Polish–German foreign policy utilized History  between 1918 and 1939. This phenomenon is referred to as foreign history politics, understood as “the state's effort to promote abroad the desired image of its own history or a particular aspect of its history” (Jan Rydel). The term propaganda, which was viewed positively in some countries at the time, was used for this in Poland.  

In addition to the activities of state actors such as the Foreign Ministry, the Polish embassy in Berlin and the consulates, this project examines the work of selected contemporary scientific institutes. Press articles, state-sponsored historical exhibitions, film screenings and historians' congresses are analyzed. Moreover, selected publications as well as speeches by Polish politicians and diplomats in Germany are used.

The following research questions will be addressed as part of the project: What were the guidelines for foreign history politics towards Germany? Were they the same or at least similar for all institutions that dealt with German issues? Was there a coherent idea of Polish history and what image of Poland was desired? One of the key questions is whether specific Polish guidelines were issued for individual regions in Germany. The investigation into the internal discussions in the Polish Foreign Ministry shows that cultural and historical arguments were used more frequently regarding Germany than any other of Poland’s neighboring states. 

Previous research has focused primarily on examining German propaganda. An analysis of the use of history within Polish diplomatic relations with [AW1]  Germany constitutes a largely unaddressed research gap. The project will not only address this important issue, but will make it possible to compare the current mechanisms of historical diplomacy with their historical predecessors.

23
Apr
Vortrag
Prof. Sigurður Gylfi Magnússon: Barefoot Historians, Manuscript Culture and Microhistory
Read more